Indemnification Clauses: What Risks are You Actually Assuming?

Jul 29, 2015

By: Craig Watrous

Indemnification clauses are particularly common in professional service, design, software and construction contracts. Often times these are the most disputed provisions in the contract negotiations of MSA’s (master services agreement), consulting agreements, and construction contracts.  So what is an indemnification clause, and what is actually being contractually agreed to by the indemnifying party?  It’s unfortunate, but all too often these clauses are accepted without fully understanding their scope and potential impacts.

Let’s start with what an indemnification actually is.  Black’s Law Dictionary defines indemnification as: “The action of compensating for loss or damage sustained”, and indemnity as: “A duty to make good any, loss, damage, or liability incurred by another. 2. The right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty.” The indemnitor is the party doing the indemnifying (the party accepting the risk). The indemnitee is the party being indemnified (the party shifting the risk).

Perhaps easier to understand is the following: an indemnification is a contractual risk transfer from one party to another. An indemnity is a contractual agreement whereby one party agrees to assume the liability of another party in the event of a claim (like a lawsuit) or a loss.  While the concept of making the indemnified party (generally the client/owner) whole for losses caused by the contractor is rational, too often the provisions in indemnification clauses are too one-sided in favor of the client/owner and require the contractor to assume the liability of the client/owner regardless of actual fault.  Contractors should be careful and should reject broadly written indemnity provisions and revise them so that the indemnity obligation is limited to the extent that damages are actually caused by the contractor’s negligent performance of services under the contract.  If the indemnification clause is not appropriately negligence-based, the contractor may be exposed to liability far beyond what it is insured for and far in excess of the fee it received under the contract.

Before signing a contract with an indemnification clause make sure you review the scope of the indemnification. A few questions that should be considered:

  • Who is indemnifying whom?
  • What risks are you being asked to indemnify?
  • Is the indemnification mutual or entirely one-sided?
  • What risks are you being asked to indemnify? (typical provisions are intellectual property infringement, property damage, injury and/or death, economic loss, attorney fees, etc.).
  • Is there a duty to defend?  Meaning, do you have to front the litigation defense costs for the indemnified party?  If so, do you get to choose the attorneys or do they? Who controls settlement decisions?
  • Is there a limitation on liability?
  • Is there a time frame/limit on identifiable claims? 
  • Are you being asked to indemnify the other party for their negligence?
  • Is there a monetary limit on the extent of the indemnity?
  • Are there insurance coverage requirements?

Ultimately, deciding how to respond to a broadly written indemnification clause will depend on a number of factors: negotiation power, prior experience with the other party, the value of the contract, evaluation of the potential risks, and insurance coverage.

Don’t review the indemnification clauses in a vacuum;  be sure to review the other risk allocation provisions in the contract.  Review the dispute resolution clauses and ensure that they are reasonable.  Also, check the governing law provisions;  courts hate to see negligent parties shift their liability on to others. Some states prohibit parties from indemnifying against another party’s negligence.  

Indemnification clauses are complicated and can result in far-reaching, unintended liability for the uniformed party. An overly broad, one-sided indemnification clause can suck all the sweetness out of a deal. Review them carefully and negotiate them firmly and creatively. 

mlmw_mark_MD.pngMallon Lonnquist Morris & Watrous, PLLC, is a business, employment, real estate, and litigation law firm. Craig T. Watrous is a Colorado transactional lawyer with Mallon & Lonnquist, based in Denver, Colorado. Craig regularly represents clients on both sides of indemnification clauses. Craig can be reached at


Category: M&L Legal Posts

Category List

Tag List

Lease Negotiations (1)
Commercial Real Estate (2)
Colorado Business (56)
Reed Morris (1)
Denver Business Journal (2)
Mechanic's Liens (1)
Taxes (2)
Estate Planning (4)
Stock Options (1)
Construction (6)
Data Breach (2)
Corporate Law (8)
Contracts (1)
Snowboard Gear (1)
Property Surveys (1)
St. Anthony, Minnesota (1)
Colorado Enforcement of Non-Compete (2)
Colorado business disputes (1)
CO Ski and Snowboard Gear Recall (1)
Spanish Legal Services (8)
News and Updates (4)
Denver Colorado Business Attorney (9)
Estate Protection (2)
Construction Contracts (5)
Tax (2)
Colorado attorney mentor (2)
County Court (1)
CO Attorney Mentoring Program (1)
cause for termination (1)
Data Breach Settlement (1)
Helmet Recall (1)
Colorado Courts (2)
Spanish Speaking Lawyers Committee (2)
subcontractor negotiations (2)
Denver Real Estate (1)
Mergers & Acquisitions (5)
Enforcing Non-Solicitation Agreement (1)
Non-Competition Agreements (12)
Wills (1)
CO Business Non-Solicitation Restrictions (1)
Landowners (1)
Master Services Agreement (2)
Colorado Judicial Institute (1)
Certifiably Green Denver (1)
indemnifications (2)
LLC Law (2)
ADR (1)
American Bar Association (2)
Colorado Hispanic Bar Association (1)
Real Estate Law Firm (3)
Community (30)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (5)
Our Courts Colorado (1)
Wrongful Death Settlement (1)
Spanish Business Law (9)
Resolutions (1)
Co-Ownership Agreement (1)
Colorado Real Estate (11)
cyber security (3)
Non-Solicitiation (1)
Business Services (3)
Non-Compete (2)
Legal Services (1)
Resolving Business Disputes (1)
Non-Solicitation (1)
Overtime Wages (2)
Business Contracts (3)
Arbitration (2)
Colorado at-will employment (1)
Commercial Property (2)
Colorado Lis Pendens (1)
Denver Sustainable Law Firm (1)
Denver arbitration (1)
ABA (1)
Colorado Retail Leasing (1)
Research (1)
Panelist (1)
Non-Disclosure (1)
Cherry Creek Chamber of Commerce (1)
Trade Secrets (6)
Colorado LLC (1)
Employment Law (1)
Colorado Construction (1)
Leasing Standard (1)
courts (1)
Colorado Employment (20)
Estate (4)
Litigation (15)
Mediation (1)
Denver Broncos (1)
Incentive Plans (1)
Phantom Stock (1)
Credit Card Data (1)
Employment (4)
Leases (6)
Labor (3)
ABA Article (1)
Colorado Foundation for Water Education (1)
Non-Compete, Colorado non-compete restrictions, enforcing non-compete, protecting Colorado business (1)
Real Estate (5)
Colorado Spanish Legal Services (1)
Cell Tower Leases (1)
Colorado Wrongful Death (1)
Skiing Gear (1)
Construction Bond Claims (2)
Ethics (1)
attorney-client privilege (2)
Business (3)
Finance Law (2)
Denver Business Law (1)