civiccenter.jpg

Trends in the Enforcement of Non-Competition Agreements

Sep 11, 2013

Trends in the Enforcement of Non-Competition Agreements

 

By: Craig Watrous 

As we’ve discussed in past blog posts, the enforcement of covenants not to compete in Colorado (also called non-competition agreements or “noncompetes”) is an evolving area of law (http://www.mallon-lonnquist.com/blog/colorado-non-competition-agreements/).  A covenant not to compete is an agreement that prohibits an entity or a person from competing with another person or entity for a set period of time within a certain geographical area.  Noncompetes are common for business’ employment agreements and in transactions involving the sale of businesses.  Enforcement of noncompetes is based on a number of factors including reasonableness, duration, geographical limitations, scope and state law. 

The Wall Street Journal recently wrote an article discussing a national increase in the number of lawsuits related to non-competition agreements and the effect such litigation is having on state economies and job creation.  (“When a New Job Leads to a Lawsuit”, Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2013).  According to the Wall Street Journal, in the past decade there has been a 60% increase in the number of published court opinions related to noncompetion litigation.  However, it is likely that this percentage is low.  As the Journal points out, “Since most cases are settled out of court and most opinions aren’t reported, that tally is likely low.” These statistics would not capture the portion of claims that are settled before litigation is commenced.

For Colorado businesses, having a well-drafted and enforceable noncompete agreement is an important method of limiting the damages from the loss of a key employee to a competing business.  From an employee’s perspective, a noncompete can become a significant barrier to leaving a job, starting a business or advancing a career.  Often a business’ threat of litigation is enough to dissuade an ex-employee from violating their non-competition agreement.  New employers are also cautious of hiring individuals who are subject to non-competition restrictions.

As an evolving body of law, state noncompete laws, including Colorado’s noncompete statute, have tried to balance the enforcement of covenants not to compete with the rights of businesses and interests of individuals.  Colorado businesses have the right to protect their confidential information, customer relationships and trade secrets.  Individuals have the right to seek employment, start new businesses, and compete in an open economy.  As the article points out, critics of noncompetes argue that they there is little evidence noncompetes provide any social or economic advantages.  They argue that noncompetes stifle innovation, result in fewer startups, fewer patents, and have the unintended consequence of hindering entrepreneurship.   In response to these concerns, some states have banned non-competition agreements outright.

In July 2012, New Hampshire passed a new law that voids noncompetes that are not provided to employees before or when a job offer is made, or when a current employee’s position changes.  New Jersey and Minnesota have also recently enacted laws limiting the scope of enforceable noncompetes.  Under the California law, most noncompetes are considered void.  However, as the article points out, “Even in states that don’t enforce noncompete agreements, employees can face lawsuits alleging that they have misappropriated trade secrets.” Id.

In Colorado covenants not to compete are void, except in limited circumstances.  Under these limited circumstances, noncompetes in Colorado are enforceable.  These circumstances need to be reviewed on a case by case basis and depend on a number of factors including the type of transaction/contract and/or the type of employee who is subject to the covenant not to compete.  When drafting, entering into or enforcing noncompetes, there are a number of critical factors that must be considered.  What is clear from the article is that regardless of the societal utility of noncompetes their use is on the rise and the increase in litigation is likely to continue.  Stay tuned. 

For the full Wall Street Journal Article please see the link below:

(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323446404579011501388418552.html) 

(Mallon & Lonnquist, LLC, is a business, employment, real estate, and litigation law firm. Craig T. Watrous is a Colorado business attorney with Mallon & Lonnquist, based in Denver, Colorado. Craig regularly represents clients on both sides of covenants not to compete. Craig can be reached at cwatrous@mallon-lonnquist.com.)




View Craig Watrous's profile on LinkedIn

 




Category: M&L Legal Posts

Category List


Tag List

Wrongful Death Settlement (1)
Colorado Business (56)
Colorado business disputes (1)
Legal Updates (5)
Mediation (1)
Non-Competition Agreements (12)
Colorado attorney mentor (2)
Construction Contracts (5)
Reed Morris (1)
(33)
Snowboard Gear (1)
Spanish Speaking Lawyers Committee (3)
Denver Colorado Business Attorney (9)
ABA Article (1)
Business Disputes (8)
cause for termination (1)
Landlords (1)
Our Courts Colorado (1)
Phantom Stock (1)
cyber security (3)
Co-Ownership Agreement (1)
Trade Secrets (6)
Business (5)
Colorado Real Estate (11)
Cell Tower Leases (1)
Business Contracts (8)
LLC Law (2)
Non-Disclosure (1)
Colorado at-will employment (1)
Breach of Contract (3)
Data Breach Settlement (1)
Business Attorney (2)
Business Litigation (4)
Colorado Employment (20)
Denver Broncos (1)
attorney-client privilege (2)
Denver Real Estate (1)
Certifiably Green Denver (1)
Resolutions (1)
Business Law (1)
Business Services (5)
Data Breach (2)
Ethics (1)
Enforcing Non-Solicitation Agreement (1)
Leases (7)
Stock Options (1)
Helmet Recall (1)
Arbitration (5)
Overtime Wages (2)
Colorado Construction (1)
Legal Services (1)
Leasing Standard (1)
Corporate Law (8)
Incentive Plans (1)
Construction Bond Claims (2)
CO Attorney Mentoring Program (1)
Colorado LLC (1)
Non-Compete, Colorado non-compete restrictions, enforcing non-compete, protecting Colorado business (1)
Colorado Foundation for Water Education (1)
St. Anthony, Minnesota (1)
News and Updates (15)
Contracts (3)
Skiing Gear (1)
Denver Sustainable Law Firm (1)
CO Ski and Snowboard Gear Recall (1)
Mergers & Acquisitions (5)
Denver Business Law (1)
Construction (6)
Research (1)
subcontractor negotiations (2)
Real Estate (6)
Panelist (1)
Taxes (1)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (6)
County Court (1)
ABA (1)
Colorado Wrongful Death (1)
Master Services Agreement (2)
CO Business Non-Solicitation Restrictions (1)
Labor (3)
American Bar Association (2)
Colorado Enforcement of Non-Compete (2)
Non-Solicitation (1)
Commercial Real Estate (2)
Commercial Property (2)
Colorado Retail Leasing (1)
Employment (4)
Litigation (19)
Property Surveys (1)
Colorado Spanish Legal Services (1)
Non-Solicitiation (1)
Colorado Hispanic Bar Association (1)
Credit Card Data (1)
Colorado Judicial Institute (1)
Finance Law (2)
Real Estate Law Firm (3)
Resolving Business Disputes (1)
Non-Compete (2)
Community (33)
indemnifications (3)
courts (1)
Denver arbitration (1)
Spanish Business Law (9)
Mechanic's Liens (1)
ADR (2)
Employment Law (1)
Denver Business Journal (2)
Colorado Courts (2)
Cherry Creek Chamber of Commerce (1)
Landowners (1)
Colorado Lis Pendens (1)
Lease Negotiations (1)
Spanish Legal Services (10)

Archive