mallonbuilding.jpg

M&A Transactions The 338(h)(10) Exchange - The Best of Both Worlds

Sep 28, 2016

338 (h)(10) Exchange

 

M&A Transactions

The 338(h)(10) Exchange - The Best of Both Worlds

 by: Craig Watrous 338(h)(10) Lawyer

In any business purchase the tax consequences of the deal structure need to be carefully evaluated.  Not reviewing the tax implications can have serious consequences for both the buyer and the seller. There are generally two ways to sell a business, a stock sale or an asset sale.  For the seller, it’s money well spent to have an M&A experienced accountant crunch the numbers from the purchase price valuation figures and determine what the actual, after tax, take home amount will be from both structures. For the buyer its critical to review the tax implications and determine what legitimate deductions are available.  

These calculations will help guide the decision regarding the type of transaction (asset or stock sale), that will take place and may also significantly impact the type of buyer who will be willing to acquire the business.  Most buyers will want an asset sale and are going to fight hard to get it.  Remember the Golden Rule: he who has the gold makes the rules. Often it’s the buyer who makes the final decision regarding the deal structure. Buyers usually want asset sales because they allow them to purchase the target’s assets, take a ‘step up’ in the basis of the assets, and recognize the immediate benefits of depreciating them. The buyer also avoids having to assume liability for the company’s past operations. On the flip side, stock sales allow the seller to realize the purchase price at a favorable capital gains tax rate. Also, it makes the transition between the buyer and the seller smoother.  However, there are far fewer tax advantages for the buyer in a stock sale, stock isn’t depreciable.

Depending on the seller and buyer’s corporate structures an 338(h)(10) exchange could be a practical and mutually beneficial alternative. A 338(h)(10) permits the seller to sell the business stock for legal purposes and the buyer to acquire the business assets for tax purposes.  Rather than try to recreate the wheel, Forbes Magazine has done a great job of explaining what a 338(h)(10) transaction looks like and its general impacts on an M&A deal. 

See the full article here:  http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonynitti/2015/10/05/tax-geek-tuesday-a-buyers-best-friend-understanding-the-section-338h10-election/#e639ded13146

There are explicit tax and legal requirements that must be met to qualify for a 338(h)(10) exchange. These should be explored early in the process with legal and tax advisors to see if your transaction qualifies for a 338(h)(10) exchange.

(Mallon Lonnquist Morris & Watrous, PLLC, is a business, employment, real estate, and litigation law firm. Craig T. Watrous is a Colorado M&A attorney and partner at MLMW, based in Denver, Colorado. Craig regularly represents clients on both sides of 338(h)(10) transactions. Craig can be reached at cwatrous@mlmw-law.com and (303) 722-2165.)

 



Category: M&L Legal Posts

Category List


Tag List

Denver Broncos (1)
Business Law (1)
Construction Contracts (5)
subcontractor negotiations (2)
Wills (1)
Mediation (1)
Property Surveys (1)
Incentive Plans (1)
Colorado Business (56)
Business Contracts (5)
ABA Article (1)
Arbitration (4)
Real Estate (5)
indemnifications (3)
Spanish Legal Services (9)
Data Breach (2)
Certifiably Green Denver (1)
Landowners (1)
Denver Business Journal (2)
Data Breach Settlement (1)
Colorado Spanish Legal Services (1)
Resolutions (1)
Spanish Speaking Lawyers Committee (2)
Colorado Retail Leasing (1)
ADR (2)
Colorado Enforcement of Non-Compete (2)
Non-Competition Agreements (12)
Estate (5)
Phantom Stock (1)
Tax (3)
Stock Options (1)
St. Anthony, Minnesota (1)
Commercial Property (2)
Enforcing Non-Solicitation Agreement (1)
courts (1)
Colorado Lis Pendens (1)
Legal Services (1)
Construction Bond Claims (2)
Cell Tower Leases (1)
Denver Colorado Business Attorney (9)
Non-Compete, Colorado non-compete restrictions, enforcing non-compete, protecting Colorado business (1)
Colorado Employment (20)
Leases (6)
Snowboard Gear (1)
LLC Law (2)
Mergers & Acquisitions (5)
ABA (1)
Corporate Law (8)
Overtime Wages (2)
Non-Disclosure (1)
Research (1)
Employment Law (1)
Reed Morris (1)
County Court (1)
cause for termination (1)
Non-Solicitation (1)
Commercial Real Estate (2)
Ethics (1)
Denver Sustainable Law Firm (1)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (6)
Skiing Gear (1)
Wrongful Death Settlement (1)
Denver arbitration (1)
Finance Law (2)
Mechanic's Liens (1)
Employment (4)
Labor (3)
Colorado Construction (1)
Resolving Business Disputes (1)
Spanish Business Law (9)
Colorado Foundation for Water Education (1)
Helmet Recall (1)
Panelist (1)
CO Ski and Snowboard Gear Recall (1)
Lease Negotiations (1)
(33)
Estate Protection (2)
Colorado Judicial Institute (1)
American Bar Association (2)
Litigation (15)
Credit Card Data (1)
Our Courts Colorado (1)
CO Attorney Mentoring Program (1)
Colorado Hispanic Bar Association (1)
Colorado Real Estate (11)
Co-Ownership Agreement (1)
Leasing Standard (1)
Contracts (1)
Non-Compete (2)
Business Services (5)
cyber security (3)
Colorado at-will employment (1)
Colorado business disputes (1)
Denver Real Estate (1)
News and Updates (7)
Colorado LLC (1)
attorney-client privilege (2)
Master Services Agreement (2)
Construction (6)
Trade Secrets (6)
Real Estate Law Firm (3)
Community (31)
Estate Planning (4)
CO Business Non-Solicitation Restrictions (1)
Taxes (2)
Non-Solicitiation (1)
Business Disputes (2)
Colorado attorney mentor (2)
Denver Business Law (1)
Cherry Creek Chamber of Commerce (1)
Business (4)
Colorado Courts (2)
Colorado Wrongful Death (1)

Archive